Improving original 302 exhaust

Discussion in 'General Maverick/Comet' started by Maverick Dude, May 29, 2015.

  1. Maverick Dude

    Maverick Dude Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2015
    Messages:
    991
    Likes Received:
    269
    Trophy Points:
    197
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Cranbrook, BC Canada
    Vehicle:
    1973 Maverick Two Door 302 C4 LDO
    I want to improve the original exhaust on a 1973 302 Mav. It was in storage for 21 years and has what I believe is the original exhaust system. It has a single two inch pipe from the Y to a resonator. Behind the resonator it actually reduces to 1-3/4", goes above the axle and back down to a cylindrical baffled muffler which seems to have a 2" rear outlet but has a clamp-on down turn that is 1-3/4". I don't want to go to duals at this point so I am planning on cutting ahead of the resonator, removing everything back of that and installing a two inch pipe around the axle with a 2" straight through muffler similar to a Thrush and then a short 2" down turn. Two questions: was that really how it came from the factory and does anyone have a alternative solution other than duals or coming out the side ahead of the wheels.
     
  2. Crazy Larry

    Crazy Larry Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2005
    Messages:
    3,557
    Likes Received:
    603
    Trophy Points:
    287
    Location:
    Wichita, Kansas
    Vehicle:
    '73 Maverick 2-door, 302, manual trans
    Yes, it came that way from the factory. You should really go with duals, but at one time many years ago I had a turbo muffler installed where the resonator was, and eliminated the resonator and the original muffler at the back next to the gas tank. I then put a dual "Monza" chrome tip on it exiting just a couple inches past the valance.
     
  3. 55crownvic

    55crownvic Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2009
    Messages:
    1,065
    Likes Received:
    214
    Trophy Points:
    208
    Location:
    colorado springs
    Vehicle:
    76 Small Bumpered Maverick(sold), 691/2 Maverick, 55 Ford Club Sedan, 65 Fairlane 500 Hardtop, 1960 Galaxie Club Sedan
    Definately go with the shorty headers from summit, if I could do mine over, thats the route I would go, better than the long tube headers I have now, IMO.
     
  4. Crazy Larry

    Crazy Larry Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2005
    Messages:
    3,557
    Likes Received:
    603
    Trophy Points:
    287
    Location:
    Wichita, Kansas
    Vehicle:
    '73 Maverick 2-door, 302, manual trans
    But do they fit??
     
  5. 55crownvic

    55crownvic Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2009
    Messages:
    1,065
    Likes Received:
    214
    Trophy Points:
    208
    Location:
    colorado springs
    Vehicle:
    76 Small Bumpered Maverick(sold), 691/2 Maverick, 55 Ford Club Sedan, 65 Fairlane 500 Hardtop, 1960 Galaxie Club Sedan
    yes, I tried a set from Pete's brother, the only problem I had (on my car) was they interferred with my rack, but that was only because I installed my rack to fit the long tube headers, If I would have had a set of these shorties when I was doing the rack install I woulda been able to make them fit, no sweat.
     
  6. Crazy Larry

    Crazy Larry Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2005
    Messages:
    3,557
    Likes Received:
    603
    Trophy Points:
    287
    Location:
    Wichita, Kansas
    Vehicle:
    '73 Maverick 2-door, 302, manual trans
    How do they compare to the Hedman or Thorleys listed for Mavericks?
     
  7. groberts101

    groberts101 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2007
    Messages:
    4,166
    Likes Received:
    535
    Trophy Points:
    297
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Minneapolis, MN
    Vehicle:
    1971 Comet GT
    If you're not going to be using smooth bent mandrel bent piping?.. use at least 2.5" piping due to the crimp bent piping losing diameter in those areas. Using a 2" crimp bent pipe will end up around 1 5/8" at the crimps.

    You're also wasting much potential flow and efficiency if you use a tiny 2" muffler too. Go as far forward as you can, all the way to the Y-pipe, and you will get the most gain possible without actually replacing the Y-pipe or going true dual.

    The difference between my version and yours will be extra throttle response and about 4-6 ft/lbs more torque. Will be even more if you tune the ignition and fuel curves to maximize the gain.
     
  8. 55crownvic

    55crownvic Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2009
    Messages:
    1,065
    Likes Received:
    214
    Trophy Points:
    208
    Location:
    colorado springs
    Vehicle:
    76 Small Bumpered Maverick(sold), 691/2 Maverick, 55 Ford Club Sedan, 65 Fairlane 500 Hardtop, 1960 Galaxie Club Sedan
    Hmmmm, all I can compare them to, is the long tube hedmans that are on my car now. Sorry.
     
  9. OLD GOOSE

    OLD GOOSE Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2011
    Messages:
    656
    Likes Received:
    59
    Trophy Points:
    101
    Location:
    WV
    Vehicle:
    1972 ford maverick
    Most people go too big on the exhaust pipe size on a stock motor a 302 is a small motor go with dual exhaust over any single pipe you will be glad you did
     
    Crazy Larry likes this.
  10. groberts101

    groberts101 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2007
    Messages:
    4,166
    Likes Received:
    535
    Trophy Points:
    297
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Minneapolis, MN
    Vehicle:
    1971 Comet GT
    This is true to larger degree on full dual systems but would be much harder to be too large on a single exhaust setup. 2.5" single after the y-pipe is still small for a 300 cubic inch engine.

    In fact, a very well designed single pipe system with.. let's say 4" piping.. shooting out before the rear tire will make more average power than running 2 separate 2.25" pipes over the rear axle. The primary reason being that increased frictional losses from more interior pipe surface and more bend area(further frictional losses) ends in reduced scavenging affect/increased pumping losses and causes an overall efficiency loss in a dual setup. But.. people seem to love that lopey sound of an overly large true dual system and have a tough time fully understanding what that lopey sound costs them in the long run. Even moreso true when it comes to cam choice but that's a whole other discussion right there. And many get both wrong which only gives a narrower/peakier power band that does not bode well for a heavier street car carrying passengers around.

    The bigger problem comes from those who use headers with 3" collectors on stock/mild 302 cid applications and ALSO feel the need to use too big a pipe diameter which only just serves to add insult to injury. As many have seen firsthand.. sounding tough and being tough can be very different things.
     
    krelboyne likes this.
  11. Maverick Dude

    Maverick Dude Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2015
    Messages:
    991
    Likes Received:
    269
    Trophy Points:
    197
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Cranbrook, BC Canada
    Vehicle:
    1973 Maverick Two Door 302 C4 LDO
    Thanks for the input everyone. I got back in touch with Dyent and ended up purchasing his 2-1/4" single exhaust system with a Thrush Turbo muffler, 2-1/4" over the axle to a straight- through muffler and chrome tip. It sounds excellent and should be much less back pressure than the 1-3/4" system. The system was from a Arizona Comet David had purchased and brought up to Vancouver, BC, Canada. I believe David is going with new duals. My car is in Cranbrook, BC, about 1000 miles away so David shipped it VIA greyhound after removing it from the donor car. He did an excellent job in packing it up to survive the freight trip on the bus. Jim, the local muffler guy installed it in just a few hours.

    For those fans of dual systems, yes, it is the way to go, but I like my sleeper look, the simplicity and the low cost. Maybe later!

    D.M.
     

Share This Page