Gear Ratio For Maverick

Discussion in 'General Maverick/Comet' started by MistaVista, Nov 2, 2012.

  1. MistaVista

    MistaVista Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2012
    Messages:
    478
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Sun City, CA
    Vehicle:
    1974 Maverick 1970 Falcon Futura 4 dr.
    not sure which area this should be posted in...so, i figured that this would be a good place to start...i have a 1974 Maverick with a 302 and C4 trans...the rear end is 3.00...my question is, are there any rear ends that are more "freeway friendly"...? :huh: thanks in advance for any information...
     
  2. mercgt73

    mercgt73 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2003
    Messages:
    3,829
    Likes Received:
    354
    Trophy Points:
    223
    Location:
    Eastern Shore, Maryland
    Vehicle:
    1973 Comet GT (clone), 1974 Mustang II, 1980 Bobcat Wagon
    Sounds like you want overdrive. The only higher ratio is a 2.79.
     
  3. rthomas771

    rthomas771 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2008
    Messages:
    8,074
    Likes Received:
    962
    Trophy Points:
    498
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    GA
    Vehicle:
    '74 Maverick 302 5-Speed.'60 Falcon V8. '63.5 Falcon HT
    Although I have a 250 six cylinder. I swapped my 2.79 to a 3.00 and got better MPG's. The reason is because the engine doesn’t have to work hard with the leverage its getting from the extra ratio to get up to speed or maintain speed.
     
  4. MistaVista

    MistaVista Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2012
    Messages:
    478
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Sun City, CA
    Vehicle:
    1974 Maverick 1970 Falcon Futura 4 dr.
    thanks...guess i'll be keeping an eye out for that sometime down the road...:yup:
     
  5. groberts101

    groberts101 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2007
    Messages:
    4,166
    Likes Received:
    535
    Trophy Points:
    297
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Minneapolis, MN
    Vehicle:
    1971 Comet GT
    A quick fix would be to use a taller tire for now. Then recurve the disty.. because factory advance curves suck cheezits.. for improved power at typical cruising rpm.

    An adjustable vacuum pot, bumped initial timing, and limited total timing figures will usually help quite a bit too. That can be worth an EASY 2 mpg or well more on ocassion. If you drive a lot that'll pay for those new taller tires in no time. (y)
     
  6. MrP

    MrP Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2011
    Messages:
    404
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Vehicle:
    1970 Maverick 302
    I had 2.79

    Made for good fun on the freeway :dance:

    Actually schooled a friend in a new mustang from 55mph +

    I swear it could go 130 with the 26" tires. Slam second to 6500 grab third and MOVE.

    Around town...It was a turd. Leaving the line and slug along until 4000rpm where the motor started screaming.

    If you had a 351W or a 460 or something the 2.79 probably would work. With a stick it would be fine, but it was so slow from a dig it was pitiful.



    Swapped in 4.11's and OMIGOD. Scary :burnout: Unfortunately now a 5 speed is in the works due to the 3500rpm cruising at 70mph...:rofl:

    With 4.11's it is spinning way to much to catch 2nd on the freeway, thus it lost a TON of speed up high. With the t-5 I hope she makes up for it :yahoo:
     
  7. 71gold

    71gold Frank Cooper Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2002
    Messages:
    26,589
    Likes Received:
    2,935
    Trophy Points:
    978
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    MACON,GA.
    Vehicle:
    '73 Grabber

    I know somewhere in this you said something...:hmmm:

    ...:D...
     
  8. MrP

    MrP Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2011
    Messages:
    404
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Vehicle:
    1970 Maverick 302
    Long story short...

    2.80's are boring.

    4.11's are too much fun.
     
  9. lynhrt210

    lynhrt210 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2009
    Messages:
    768
    Likes Received:
    8
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    somewhere
    Vehicle:
    1974 ford maverick
    Lol :rofl2: ^^^^^

    I have the 4.11's and the t5 and love it
     
  10. silver70

    silver70 Eric

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2004
    Messages:
    406
    Likes Received:
    15
    Trophy Points:
    75
    Location:
    Phoenix, AZ
    Vehicle:
    '70 Maverick
    3.80's and C-4. Haven't tried it yet.
     
  11. Streamliner

    Streamliner Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2010
    Messages:
    578
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    100
    3:80's with a T-5....Perfect!
     
  12. velvetguru

    velvetguru Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2011
    Messages:
    28
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    20
    Location:
    Owasso, OK
    Vehicle:
    1975 Mercury Comet, 1965 Ford Mustang, 1962 Lark Daytona
    It's true that an overdrive will give you the best of both worlds, a good take-off and lower RPM's on the highway, but without the overdrive the 2.79 will slow the engine down somewhat. Compared to a 3.00 the 2.79 will reduce your RPM's 7% (2500 RPM will become 2325 RPM, 3000 will become 2790 etc) It will also reduce your take-off by 7% Gearing is a compromise. If you do alot of stop-n-go, intown driving I would keep the 3.00 if you do mostly highway driving and speeds over 60 I would go with the 2.79 I have owned cars with both and for me I'd want the 2.79 Hope this helps.

    Joe
     
    Last edited: Nov 4, 2012
  13. groberts101

    groberts101 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2007
    Messages:
    4,166
    Likes Received:
    535
    Trophy Points:
    297
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Minneapolis, MN
    Vehicle:
    1971 Comet GT
    In my experience, almost anything running a smaller motor, especially if it's cammed up a bit, with an OD trans and using taller than 3.25 gears will struggle with long highway grades. Plus, around town driving on slightly faster roads won't even allow the OD to kick in very often either.

    3.00 rear gear combined with that trans will give you a final drive of about 2 to 1. Seems like a pretty tall gear unless you specifically build the motor for low-end torque. A higher compression would surely help there too.

    On the other hand.. the car is pretty light though.. so maybe you'll be fine going up slight grades during 1,400 rpm OD cruising? I just know cars that weight 400-600 lbs more don't particulalry care for it.

    If you want your cake and get to eat it too?.. 3.25 - 3.50 gears are perfect "mileage combo's" with an OD trans. Just depends on how often you like to eat that cake. :drive:
     
    Last edited: Nov 5, 2012
  14. MistaVista

    MistaVista Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2012
    Messages:
    478
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Sun City, CA
    Vehicle:
    1974 Maverick 1970 Falcon Futura 4 dr.
    thanks for all of the replies...my next question is...with the 3.00 rear end, what would be a "comfortable" freeway speed that wouldn't keep me in the slow lane...? :huh: my Mav has a c-4...
     
  15. groberts101

    groberts101 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2007
    Messages:
    4,166
    Likes Received:
    535
    Trophy Points:
    297
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Minneapolis, MN
    Vehicle:
    1971 Comet GT
    I can only assume you meant "freeway RPM" since no one can really tell you what is a "comfortable speed" in your particular traffic situation or law enforcement status. Personally.. I'm not happy unless I'm passing 90% or more of traffic. lol

    As of late, there are many here who would know better than me since it's been a while since I've been cruising with 3.00's.

    but IIRC, I used to tool down the highway at around 2,200-2,400 rpm @ around 60mph with 26 or 27 inch tires. And the 289's and 302's made enough torque to pull you up bigger hills without issue.
     
    Last edited: Nov 5, 2012

Share This Page