Ford 302

Discussion in 'Technical' started by Seannan9824, Jul 2, 2007.

  1. Seannan9824

    Seannan9824 Member

    Joined:
    May 21, 2007
    Messages:
    15
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Reno, Nevada
    Vehicle:
    1973 Ford Maverick
    What do you guys think of Ford's new Boss 302 Block?
    :)
     
  2. scooper77515

    scooper77515 No current projects.

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2004
    Messages:
    14,672
    Likes Received:
    73
    Trophy Points:
    233
    Location:
    Issaquah/Grand Coulee, WA
    Vehicle:
    Fresh out of Mavericks
    It is crap, so if you have one, just send it to me and I will take it to the recycling center for you...:D

    I will even be generous enough to send you a check for what the center gives me, like $10 or so:clap:
     
  3. Seannan9824

    Seannan9824 Member

    Joined:
    May 21, 2007
    Messages:
    15
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Reno, Nevada
    Vehicle:
    1973 Ford Maverick
    Ten bucks? hey thats not bad, might even be enough for the packing tape.
     
  4. scooper77515

    scooper77515 No current projects.

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2004
    Messages:
    14,672
    Likes Received:
    73
    Trophy Points:
    233
    Location:
    Issaquah/Grand Coulee, WA
    Vehicle:
    Fresh out of Mavericks
    I haven't heard a whole lot about it but what I have heard is typical of the Ford Boss products...Strong, reliable, and ready to be built and beat!

    Oh, and EXPENSIVE:huh:
     
  5. Vintage

    Vintage Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2007
    Messages:
    12
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Marion, NC
    Vehicle:
    '76 Maverick 2-Door
    I believe I read something that said the new Boss block was good for 1000+ horsepower, thats a pretty stout block.
     
  6. rayzorsharp

    rayzorsharp I "AM" a Maverick!

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2002
    Messages:
    11,256
    Likes Received:
    66
    Trophy Points:
    298
    Location:
    Grand Bay, Alabama
    Vehicle:
    Three 71 Maverick Grabbers, a 72 302 Sprint, a 73 LDO 2door parts car, a 76 silver v8 Stallion.
    I WANT ONE!!!:cool:
     
  7. ratio411

    ratio411 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2002
    Messages:
    6,060
    Likes Received:
    21
    Trophy Points:
    138
    Location:
    Pensacola
    Vehicle:
    1972 Sprint and 1975 Maverick
    I'd rather have the Man-O-War block...

    4.155 bore
    Something like 360 cubes with an 8.2 block and mild stroker crank. 380ish with max stroke.
    8.2 block also comes with 351w main webbing so you don't have to clearance the block for big stroke.
    You have to use a W oil pan, distributor, and oil pump... not a big deal.

    The 9.5 block would be 433 with a simple 408 crank.
    Can go to 460ish with a max stroke crank.

    The "Boss" block is just sales hype IMO.
    They don't even sell the long block with Boss heads.
    Hype...
     
  8. scooper77515

    scooper77515 No current projects.

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2004
    Messages:
    14,672
    Likes Received:
    73
    Trophy Points:
    233
    Location:
    Issaquah/Grand Coulee, WA
    Vehicle:
    Fresh out of Mavericks
    Apparently, you know more about this than the rest of us...

    So, I can drop a "small block" 460 into my car?:dance:
     
  9. ratio411

    ratio411 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2002
    Messages:
    6,060
    Likes Received:
    21
    Trophy Points:
    138
    Location:
    Pensacola
    Vehicle:
    1972 Sprint and 1975 Maverick
    You could, however I am more conservative and would do the tried and true 408 crank with a big bore.
    It only comes up to 433, but if you don't max out the crank, everything is soooooo much easier. No clearancing, less expensive, better rod ratio, etc so on...
     
  10. Vintage

    Vintage Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2007
    Messages:
    12
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Marion, NC
    Vehicle:
    '76 Maverick 2-Door
    I agree, it really shouldn't be called a Boss 302 without the 351C heads. However, it looks to be a great a great crate.
     
  11. PaulS

    PaulS Member extrordiare

    Joined:
    May 3, 2004
    Messages:
    4,858
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Seattle area
    Vehicle:
    1966 Mustang, 1972, 73, 73 and 73 Mavericks
    You could always bolt on a set of Ford Motorsport heads on it. Personally I think you can get as much HP out of it with after market heads. If you are turning enough RPM to need the Cleveland heads then you can afford to adapt a set to it.
     
  12. Thack

    Thack vision advicator

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2002
    Messages:
    1,147
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Moreno Valley Ca
    Vehicle:
    71 2 Dr Maverick, 70 Mustang Sportsroof, 77 F100 4x4, 72 maverick grabber wifes
    I like the new boss block I don't like Ford using the boss name for their windsor headed long blocks. I may heve even picked it if I hadn't been so far along in the build. One thing I like is it is set up to run both style heads. Before anyone starts to argue the stock 302 block needs extra holes drilled in the deck to match up with the head gasket and Cleavland heads water ports.
     

Share This Page