351w

Discussion in 'Technical' started by demo913, Jun 2, 2008.

  1. demo913

    demo913 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2004
    Messages:
    444
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    78
    Location:
    Charlotte, NC
    Vehicle:
    75 maverick 351w
    My dads friend has a 351 windsor and i am thinking about puting it in my mav. I have a 75 2door with a 250 right now. Will this work. If so does anyone know how much horsepower this engine has. The engine is also a 75. Thanks
     
  2. maverick75

    maverick75 Gotta Love Mavs!

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    9,014
    Likes Received:
    15
    Trophy Points:
    172
    Location:
    Riverside, California
    Vehicle:
    The mav is gone but i'm still here!
    it will fit, but your going to do alot of things like notch the towers get a better tranny...it'll probally have 200HP@fly
     
  3. Bioinfomatic

    Bioinfomatic Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2007
    Messages:
    244
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Philadelphia
    Vehicle:
    1977 Ford Maverick
    The 351W was introduced in 1969, year model rated at 250 hp (186 kW) with 2 barrel carb or 290 hp (216 kW) with a 4 barrel. The four barrel version actually produced 320 to 325 hp (239 to 242 kW).
     
  4. newtoford

    newtoford Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2006
    Messages:
    5,475
    Likes Received:
    8
    Trophy Points:
    157
    Location:
    New Castle Delaware
    Vehicle:
    '76 Maverick, '76 Comet, 78 Monte Carlo, '85 Cutlass Supreme, '86 Regal Limited, '87 Grand Prix
    you pretty much have to do everything involved with doing the 302 swap then deal with header fitment.

    i say go for it though
     
  5. Bioinfomatic

    Bioinfomatic Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2007
    Messages:
    244
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Philadelphia
    Vehicle:
    1977 Ford Maverick
    Why do you recommend another trans for a windsor swap, isn't the c4 good enough?
     
  6. maverick75

    maverick75 Gotta Love Mavs!

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    9,014
    Likes Received:
    15
    Trophy Points:
    172
    Location:
    Riverside, California
    Vehicle:
    The mav is gone but i'm still here!
    just checked my chilton manual

    75
    351W compact 2bbl 143@3600 255@2200 8.2:1
    351w intermediate 2bbl 154@3800 268@2200 8.2:1
    351w CAL 2bbl 153@3400 270@2400 8.2:1
     
  7. maverick75

    maverick75 Gotta Love Mavs!

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    9,014
    Likes Received:
    15
    Trophy Points:
    172
    Location:
    Riverside, California
    Vehicle:
    The mav is gone but i'm still here!
    the I6 C4 is not built the same way as the V8 C4,but being a stock engine i would see a problem but no one can resist putting on a bigger cam,intake,carb...etc.:drive:
     
  8. demo913

    demo913 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2004
    Messages:
    444
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    78
    Location:
    Charlotte, NC
    Vehicle:
    75 maverick 351w
    Thanks. So do you think the 351w is better than the 302 in the long run.
     
  9. Bioinfomatic

    Bioinfomatic Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2007
    Messages:
    244
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Philadelphia
    Vehicle:
    1977 Ford Maverick
    Depends on what type of performance you are looking for, and how you are going to treat the car. Only the driver can decide whats good enough for themselves. :thumbs2:
     
  10. demo913

    demo913 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2004
    Messages:
    444
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    78
    Location:
    Charlotte, NC
    Vehicle:
    75 maverick 351w
    I'm looking something fast...
     
  11. don graham

    don graham MCG State Rep

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2002
    Messages:
    15,800
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    302
    Location:
    arizona city, az.
    Vehicle:
    70 mav, 71 grabber, 73 Comet, 2004 f-250 crew cab diesel, 2001 f-250, 2004 explorer, 2007 Gold Wing trike.
    Either a 351w or a 302 will be fast. Just remember fast = money. The faster you go the faster your money goes.:)
     
  12. demo913

    demo913 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2004
    Messages:
    444
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    78
    Location:
    Charlotte, NC
    Vehicle:
    75 maverick 351w
    It's not an everyday car thank god. What i'm trying to get at is how much more power will the 351w bring than a 302. Thanks
     
  13. demo913

    demo913 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2004
    Messages:
    444
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    78
    Location:
    Charlotte, NC
    Vehicle:
    75 maverick 351w
  14. don graham

    don graham MCG State Rep

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2002
    Messages:
    15,800
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    302
    Location:
    arizona city, az.
    Vehicle:
    70 mav, 71 grabber, 73 Comet, 2004 f-250 crew cab diesel, 2001 f-250, 2004 explorer, 2007 Gold Wing trike.
    Again, it depends on how much you want to spend. The 351 can always make more HP than a 302, if your doing the same mods. you can always stroke the 351 out further than the 302. No substitute for cubic inches.:)
     
  15. newtoford

    newtoford Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2006
    Messages:
    5,475
    Likes Received:
    8
    Trophy Points:
    157
    Location:
    New Castle Delaware
    Vehicle:
    '76 Maverick, '76 Comet, 78 Monte Carlo, '85 Cutlass Supreme, '86 Regal Limited, '87 Grand Prix
    if its a ready to run healthy engine i'd go for it. a well built 302 would probably be faster but like don said, the faster you go the more $ you pay.

    it'll be a rocket ship compared to the 250 though :)
     

Share This Page