gt40 Cobra heads

Discussion in 'Technical' started by JonnyRebel, Nov 3, 2006.

  1. JonnyRebel

    JonnyRebel Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2005
    Messages:
    107
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Warren Pennsylvania
    Vehicle:
    1972 Maverick 4 door, 347 stroker, c4
    Would it be a good idea to put '93-'95 Cobra gt40 iron heads on my original '72 short block? How do they compare to the '72 heads? I know the combustion chambers are 2-4cc's bigger, so how much of a compression drop will that be, and is it significant? These heads I'm looking at have 1.94 and 1.54 valves, is that good? will they clear my pistons?

    thanks,
    Jon
     
  2. streetrod77

    streetrod77 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2004
    Messages:
    1,266
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    100
    Location:
    Memphis,Tenn
    Vehicle:
    77 comet
    I have those heads & they are pretty good for a stock head. It depends on how much power you want. I don't think they stack up well with the aftermarket heads. That year mustang didn't make alot of power but the torque was there. Pistons clearing I think but I could be wrong depends on the lift & duration of your cam(I think). When I change my heads, I also change alot of things at the same time so the outcome was great. I couldn't tell you about the cc's with the stock pistons though. The exhuast side could use some porting. They dont flow well there.
     
  3. scooper77515

    scooper77515 No current projects.

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2004
    Messages:
    14,672
    Likes Received:
    73
    Trophy Points:
    233
    Location:
    Issaquah/Grand Coulee, WA
    Vehicle:
    Fresh out of Mavericks
    That would be a GREAT idea (y)

    Even without porting the exhaust, they will flow much better than any iron heads you can buy, except for the GT40P (which I use)

    Best thing is, pull your head off, put this one on. No adjustments, nothing. They are a direct fit, keep the GT40 rockers and everything. Use your stock pushrods.

    I bought mine for $300 a pair, cleaned them up to get the loose grease and dirt off of them, ground out the "thermactic" smog bump and lightly polished the outer half of the exhaust port as deep in as I could reach with my Dremel tool. Easily a 50 HP improvement (that is 50 "seat-of-pants" HP, not dyno-tested HP, so it could be more or less than that).
     
  4. JonnyRebel

    JonnyRebel Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2005
    Messages:
    107
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Warren Pennsylvania
    Vehicle:
    1972 Maverick 4 door, 347 stroker, c4
    Hey thanks :tiphat:

    The heads I'm looking at already have the exhaust ported.

    How much will my compression ratio drop with these heads?
     
  5. scooper77515

    scooper77515 No current projects.

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2004
    Messages:
    14,672
    Likes Received:
    73
    Trophy Points:
    233
    Location:
    Issaquah/Grand Coulee, WA
    Vehicle:
    Fresh out of Mavericks
    You won't know the difference...You will pick up so much extra horsepower that the .1-.3 loss of compression won't even bother you.
     
  6. JonnyRebel

    JonnyRebel Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2005
    Messages:
    107
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Warren Pennsylvania
    Vehicle:
    1972 Maverick 4 door, 347 stroker, c4
    Will the stock '72 rockers work with the gt40 heads?
     
  7. ShadowMaster

    ShadowMaster The Bad Guy

    Joined:
    May 15, 2005
    Messages:
    1,156
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    95
    Location:
    The ShadowLands
    Vehicle:
    1969 1/2 Maverick
    I'd guess much less. :rolleyes:
     
  8. scooper77515

    scooper77515 No current projects.

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2004
    Messages:
    14,672
    Likes Received:
    73
    Trophy Points:
    233
    Location:
    Issaquah/Grand Coulee, WA
    Vehicle:
    Fresh out of Mavericks
    Thanks for the encouragement, Shadow :cry:
     
  9. ratio411

    ratio411 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2002
    Messages:
    6,060
    Likes Received:
    21
    Trophy Points:
    138
    Location:
    Pensacola
    Vehicle:
    1972 Sprint and 1975 Maverick
    72 stock heads vs those heads modded as described...
    I'd agree with the 50 hp at the flywheel.
    No doubt.
    The things are ported and have decent valves. Makes a big difference.

    The 72 rockers won't work.
    Someone on the board had some Cobra rocker arms. They posted on a recent thread that got into rocker ratio. I'd do a search on that. The member said that they had no use for them, however they didn't say they were for sale either, but it's worth a quick PM.

    The combustion chambers could lose as much as a whole compression point. I don't know the numbers off top of my head, except to say that the 72 short block can't afford to lose ANY amount of chamber. Check the heads, someone may have milled them while all the other work was going on. If not, you can have them milled quick before you put them on the car.

    Good luck
    Dave
     
  10. ratio411

    ratio411 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2002
    Messages:
    6,060
    Likes Received:
    21
    Trophy Points:
    138
    Location:
    Pensacola
    Vehicle:
    1972 Sprint and 1975 Maverick
    Just for giggles, I ran it through the engine analyzer...

    Stock short block, 4v Performer, 600cfm, 1 5/8" headers, and stock heads...
    240 fwhp.
    Same, but add ported GT40 iron heads with 1.94 valves...
    315 fwhp.

    75 fwhp!!!
    That's over 50 rwhp...

    I know it's not a real dyno, but it's a sure sign of the difference between the heads.

    Btw:
    When the engine was modeled totally stock... down to the 2v and single exhaust, the head swap only added 33 fwhp. But with all the restrictions on everything, it's still a wonder.

    Dave
     
  11. scooper77515

    scooper77515 No current projects.

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2004
    Messages:
    14,672
    Likes Received:
    73
    Trophy Points:
    233
    Location:
    Issaquah/Grand Coulee, WA
    Vehicle:
    Fresh out of Mavericks
    I THOUGHT it felt like a good kick. What is the compression on your sample "dyno" program? I have the 74 with 8:1, and I would be interested to know if I am near 300 HP...Also, can you put in a torker 289 with heavy porting and my cam...or even better, where do I get the program and I will do it myself :D
     
  12. grbmaverickmo

    grbmaverickmo That Maverick Guy

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2004
    Messages:
    1,255
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    112
    Location:
    Aquashicola, PA
    Vehicle:
    70 grabber.71 4dr v-8 stick.72 Sprint
    have .030 shaved off them it should put the comp back pretty close to what you have now around here its $30 a head to have it done. Did it a couple times and so far had no intake sealing problems or bolt alignment problems.
     
  13. streetrod77

    streetrod77 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2004
    Messages:
    1,266
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    100
    Location:
    Memphis,Tenn
    Vehicle:
    77 comet
     
  14. JonnyRebel

    JonnyRebel Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2005
    Messages:
    107
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Warren Pennsylvania
    Vehicle:
    1972 Maverick 4 door, 347 stroker, c4
    When the heads are milled, shorter push rods are needed correct? What size would be needed for a .030 mill?
     
  15. ratio411

    ratio411 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2002
    Messages:
    6,060
    Likes Received:
    21
    Trophy Points:
    138
    Location:
    Pensacola
    Vehicle:
    1972 Sprint and 1975 Maverick
    .030" shouldn't sweat the pushrods IMO.
    No worries at all if you have adjustable rockers...


    Edit: However, when milling beyond a certain point, they say you should have your intake milled to prevent misalignment.
    I know .020" is safe, but forgot if .030" or .040" is the point where the intake will need milling.
    I am pretty sure it is .040" max before intake mill.
    If I am wrong, someone will chime in.

    How many CCs do stock GT40 heads have?
     
    Last edited: Nov 12, 2006

Share This Page