High 9's on the 1/4

Discussion in 'General Maverick/Comet' started by MaverickGrabber, Jan 24, 2003.

  1. MaverickGrabber

    MaverickGrabber MaverickGrabber1972

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2002
    Messages:
    1,544
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    125
    Location:
    Cardington, ohio
    Vehicle:
    1972 Maverick Grabber 393w
  2. Craig Selvey

    Craig Selvey Indiana State Rep - MCCI

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2002
    Messages:
    18,304
    Likes Received:
    1,367
    Trophy Points:
    878
    Location:
    Albany, Indiana
    Vehicle:
    1972 Maverick Grabber - Color: Orange Also, 1976 Ford Maverick 4-door, 1977 Mercury Comet 2-door.
    It's here in Indiana....I might have to go and take a look!!
     
  3. expjames91

    expjames91 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2002
    Messages:
    161
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    lancaster,CA
    Vehicle:
    1973 maverick 250L
    thats listed under mustangs?
     
  4. don graham

    don graham MCG State Rep

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2002
    Messages:
    15,800
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    302
    Location:
    arizona city, az.
    Vehicle:
    70 mav, 71 grabber, 73 Comet, 2004 f-250 crew cab diesel, 2001 f-250, 2004 explorer, 2007 Gold Wing trike.
    must be a sleeper. wonder what happened to the other 1/4 of the cam. i don't think so........:cool:
     
  5. wardf

    wardf Ward Frahler

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2002
    Messages:
    1,964
    Likes Received:
    26
    Trophy Points:
    146
    Location:
    Elizabethtown, Ky.
    Vehicle:
    70 maverick
    Ya, it might be a 9sec 1/8 car (high 9s) but even that is doubtful. I never understood 3/4 cam, I know it is old school, maybe some one could explain it, closest guess by me would mean 3/4 cam equals 270 degree duration.
     
  6. MrHoba

    MrHoba Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2002
    Messages:
    12
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Medford MA
    Vehicle:
    1972 Ford Maverick
    Yeah, I had wondered about the 3/4 race cam for years. To the best of my knowledge the 3/4 cam was a GM advertising term from older car mag (late 60'S, early 70's) ads. The ads indicated their motors had a "3/4 race" cam as opposed to a "full race" cam or stock cam. Kind of silly, but typical GM.
     
  7. mavman

    mavman Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2002
    Messages:
    2,028
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    112
    Location:
    Arkansas
    Vehicle:
    '75 Maverick, '03 super duty, '04 Mustang Vee-six!
    doesnt look like a 9 sec car...but I saw a guy at Test & tune a month or so ago that had a normal stock-looking '88 Mustang LX that turned a 4.80 in the 1/8 on drag radials. He was tuning the wastegate to be able to get as much power down as he could. Everyone said that the motor dyno'd at over 1900 HP. Car looked basically stock, even idled fairly smooth. Sleeper for sure.
     
  8. MaverickGrabber

    MaverickGrabber MaverickGrabber1972

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2002
    Messages:
    1,544
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    125
    Location:
    Cardington, ohio
    Vehicle:
    1972 Maverick Grabber 393w
    Here is what i was told long time ago and it sounds good anyways :D
    3\4 cam is almost to much for the street to run vacuum brakes and stock converter auto trans full race cam is not able to run vacuum brakes and have to run stall converter for auto trans


    Brown Interior looks green to me :p
     
  9. littleredtoy

    littleredtoy Seth

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2002
    Messages:
    4,050
    Likes Received:
    15
    Trophy Points:
    162
    Location:
    North Carolina, Triangle Area
    Vehicle:
    '74 Comet GT
    ????????????

    That car looks like it would fall apart if if even hit 100 MPH.
    I'd bet everything in my wallet that it wouldn't break 12's.

    Old Guy, isn't 9 something in the quarter around 130-135 MPH? My neighbor runs a '68 Cobra Jet Mustang in 1/4 and 1/8 competition and his times are 10.25ish at 122 mph. And that
    is a big block and a helluva lot more tire than what is under that
    tired looking POS.
    He MIGHT make 9's in the 1/8 but that even seems like a bit of a stretch the way it looks. I bet he has those shackles in the back to go with those highjacker shocks!!!

    (I'm too critical, I know!)


    Seth
     
  10. 19FordMav72

    19FordMav72 Guest

    maybe he was just a fool when he bought it...
    i mean he said that when he bought the car the guy told him it ran high 9s last fall.
    maybe he was taken like an idiot??? we dont know all we know is that is NOT a 9s car
     
  11. Old Guy

    Old Guy Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2002
    Messages:
    1,291
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    95
    Mav in the 9's

    I can't say that it could not be true, but it is very unlikely unless there was a bottle and some other equipt. on it before he got it. To run a high 9( will use 9.80 for example) the car would have to run a 6.18 in 1/8th. A 9.80 in the 1/8th figures out to 15.50 1/4 mile et which sounds more like it for that car. MPH is hard to calculate because of different gear ratio and tire size plus wind and air density etc. Most dragsters at our track run 5.20's and that would be 8.23 in 1/4. Mavman's 393 windsor ran a best of 6.60 in the 1/8th and thats about a 10.40 in the 1/4.. It is a drag only car with powerglide and all the toys, on 10.5 slicks at 2600lbs. The only way I could see this car running 9's is if he sprayed it heavy at 1/8th mile and then it would be questionable to say the least. I see no reserve on the auction so 800.00 would not be that bad if it were to go for that. Just a thought, most tracks would not allow a 9 second car to run without a roll cage and such, which I did not see in this racer. I think the high 9 1/8th is what is correct . But I have been wrong before:D :D
     
  12. MaverickGrabber

    MaverickGrabber MaverickGrabber1972

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2002
    Messages:
    1,544
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    125
    Location:
    Cardington, ohio
    Vehicle:
    1972 Maverick Grabber 393w
    vin F3K91F1372281F the 3 makes it a 73 right :D not a 72 that and the filler pan thats on it
     
  13. MaverickGrabber

    MaverickGrabber MaverickGrabber1972

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2002
    Messages:
    1,544
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    125
    Location:
    Cardington, ohio
    Vehicle:
    1972 Maverick Grabber 393w
    its one of the rare Gt shelby Mavericks:D
     
  14. T.L.

    T.L. Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2002
    Messages:
    4,187
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Southern Colorado
    Vehicle:
    '73 Maverick 2-door, V-8
    You need a big-block to run quarter mile times like that. I used to work with a guy who had a '68 Camaro that ran high 9s. It had a tricked-out 454 (bored & stroked to 505 or someting like that) that he had $30,000 in the engine alone. It had a full roll cage, tubs, & all kinds of other reinforcments. Some people are so full of $hit with the claims they make.

    For a Maverick to run high 9s in the quarter with a smallblock, it would have to be completely gutted (racing seat, no interior), Lexan windows, FULL cage, ladder bar suspension, an EXTREMELY tricked-out engine, NOT street legal. The car would have to weigh next to nothing.

    I wouldn't buy a car without a Title either...
     
  15. mavman

    mavman Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2002
    Messages:
    2,028
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    112
    Location:
    Arkansas
    Vehicle:
    '75 Maverick, '03 super duty, '04 Mustang Vee-six!
    You dont have to have a big block...just a REALLY serious smallblock, or a serious lack of weight (1500-2200 lbs). Look at the Pro 5.0 cars, they're running in the 7's at over 200 mph on mostly sub-400 inch engines. It is possible, but either way you look at it, it'd be expensive for sure!
     

Share This Page