70 maverick 351w

Discussion in 'New Members Forum' started by layne, May 28, 2009.

  1. CaptainComet

    CaptainComet Large Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2007
    Messages:
    5,004
    Likes Received:
    446
    Trophy Points:
    438
    Location:
    Clearwater, FL
    Vehicle:
    72 Comet
    Layne,

    Greetings from Clearwater.

    If putting a 351 in a Mav, definitely cut back the shock towers. Changing the plugs in my car with the original 302 wasn't fun, can't imagine how bad it would be with my 351W now if we hadn't. You will appreciate the extra room.

    I had three sets of headers and the stock manifolds to look at when I put the 351 in. We pretty much ruled out the manifolds as too tight at the time. I don't know what it takes to make them work.

    We ended up using a set of headers from a 68 Cougar with a 302 ... chopped 1 inch out of each pipe just off the flange to take up the added width of the Windsor.

    Oil filter will be close to the tower ... you can notch the tower, run a shorter Mopar filter, or get a 90 degree adapter.

    Air cleaner will be close to the hood with all but the shortest intakes.

    If my 351 needs anything more than rings and bearings next time it is out of the car ... it may get replaced by a 331 stroker. :clap: 302-based motors fit ...
     
  2. madman21

    madman21 Beer is good

    Joined:
    May 5, 2007
    Messages:
    528
    Likes Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Location:
    Albuquerque, NM
    Vehicle:
    1976 2dr Mav 410ci
    lol I sorta agree
     
  3. madman21

    madman21 Beer is good

    Joined:
    May 5, 2007
    Messages:
    528
    Likes Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Location:
    Albuquerque, NM
    Vehicle:
    1976 2dr Mav 410ci
    The stock manifolds aren't just bolt on. You will need to grind the manifold down a bit. One of the studs will be impossible to get to once the engine is in place.
     
  4. CaptainComet

    CaptainComet Large Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2007
    Messages:
    5,004
    Likes Received:
    446
    Trophy Points:
    438
    Location:
    Clearwater, FL
    Vehicle:
    72 Comet
    Says the guy with that picture in his avatar ... :D :D :D

    Yup, ... it won't be close to the hood if you cut a hole in it for the air cleaner to poke through... got that setup myself... then still, I had to use a shortie air cleaner to fit under the scoop after I added a 1 inch spacer to make my manifold actually flow some air.

    Trying to figure out if it would all fit under the scoop with the Edelbrock Air-Gap RPM manifold I really want ... currently running a Performer 351 ... very torquey but even a Performer RPM is supposed to be much stronger HP-wise. Each one is a bit taller than the last.

    Oil Filter ... In my car, the full size Ford filter was rubbing the shock tower. You could physically get to on the motor, but I was really worried that first time the motor torqued over, it would damage it.

    If yours has clearance, maybe there is some difference how your motor is sitting on the mounts from how mine is. :hmmm:
     
  5. Lee Richart

    Lee Richart Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2007
    Messages:
    249
    Likes Received:
    27
    Trophy Points:
    73
    Location:
    Redford, MI
    Vehicle:
    1973 Maverick LDO 421W
    layne,
    The stock manifolds won't work without severe grinding and don't flow very well anyway. I run Tubular Automotive's that work fine with my BIG windsor with just a little caressing with a ball peen hammer. I have not seen the small tubes as a big issue. Changing the plugs is not too bad if you just take your time and experiment with different combinations of wrenches. The oil filter on the 351 is in exactly the same place as the 302. If it is hitting there is something wrong, perhaps your frame adapters are on backwards. Good luck with this swap, it will be fun.
    Lee "THE MAV" Richart
     
  6. Maviboy

    Maviboy ForOnlyRealDrivers

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2009
    Messages:
    167
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    50
    Location:
    RICHMOND,CA
    Vehicle:
    74 Maverick,71 Comet
    Just what he said.unless youre running some kind of radical engine thats gonna need some big tubes youll be just fine with the tubular automotive headers. My cousins fit right in and the car runs good.
     
  7. layne

    layne Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2009
    Messages:
    43
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    33
    Location:
    Orlando, Florida
    Vehicle:
    70 Maverick, 70 Mach 1, 70 Cougar Eliminator
    you did not have to modify the shock towers with the tubular automotive headers?
     
  8. Earl Branham

    Earl Branham Certified Old Fart

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2002
    Messages:
    6,367
    Likes Received:
    201
    Trophy Points:
    218
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Lugoff, SC
    Vehicle:
    '69.5 Maverick 302, T-5, Grabber Green
    Welcome! Glad to have you with us.
     
  9. Lee Richart

    Lee Richart Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2007
    Messages:
    249
    Likes Received:
    27
    Trophy Points:
    73
    Location:
    Redford, MI
    Vehicle:
    1973 Maverick LDO 421W
    layne,
    Yes, the tubular automotive's will fit without touching the spring towers if you flatten the two tubes on each side that want to hit. It doesn't take much and really won't affect performance. Just put a little flat on the side where they want to touch. You may have to take them off and on a time or two and the left side goes on a lot easier if you raise the engine off the motor mount a little. The steering won't go full lock to lock either, but you should be able to live with it. Good Luck,
    Lee "THE MAV" Richart
     
  10. madman21

    madman21 Beer is good

    Joined:
    May 5, 2007
    Messages:
    528
    Likes Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Location:
    Albuquerque, NM
    Vehicle:
    1976 2dr Mav 410ci
    I'm using a smaller filter maybe... Not a ford filter.
     
  11. ratio411

    ratio411 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2002
    Messages:
    6,060
    Likes Received:
    21
    Trophy Points:
    138
    Location:
    Pensacola
    Vehicle:
    1972 Sprint and 1975 Maverick
    An engine doesn't need to be "radical" to need more than 1.5" primary pipes.:huh:

    Even baseline 302 longtubes have 1.625" tubes. Decent 351w tubes are 1.75", and that is only because they can't get any larger tubing to fit. The Tubular Automotive 351c headers come 1.875" to 2" at your option. Same displacement, room for decent tubes.

    1.5" tubes are tiny. The old 5.0 HO headers were 1.5" and GM regularly puts larger tubes on smaller engines, from the factory. What's the first thing you change on a 5.0 to get some added power? Headers. And that is with 50 fewer cubes.
     
  12. ratio411

    ratio411 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2002
    Messages:
    6,060
    Likes Received:
    21
    Trophy Points:
    138
    Location:
    Pensacola
    Vehicle:
    1972 Sprint and 1975 Maverick
    :hmmm: No...
    The 351w is a wider block than a 302.
    The filter is in the same place on the side of the block,
    but the added width pushes it over towards the frame rail.
     
  13. Maviboy

    Maviboy ForOnlyRealDrivers

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2009
    Messages:
    167
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    50
    Location:
    RICHMOND,CA
    Vehicle:
    74 Maverick,71 Comet
    You know to be honest with you im a fan of 302 blocks but everybody has their own taste,I personally think the height of the 351w block is more of an issue than the width.(fitting into a Maverick) But then again anything is possible, you can fit a BIG BLOCK into a Maverick its all on how much your heart is set into it. You really have no other choice on headers unless you make them yourself,cut the shock towers and put some bigger diameter tube headers,or run stock manifolds. 1.5 longtubes arent better than stock manifolds?:hmmm:
     
  14. Lee Richart

    Lee Richart Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2007
    Messages:
    249
    Likes Received:
    27
    Trophy Points:
    73
    Location:
    Redford, MI
    Vehicle:
    1973 Maverick LDO 421W
    ratio411,
    The 351w block is wider, but only at the head surfaces. The oil filter is in exactly the same place. I have at least 1/2 inch clearance around mine. If the filter is hitting the spring tower, the engine is too far back or too high. Also my air cleaner clears my stock hood, but not by much. I run an Edelbrock Performer and no carb spacer. It's all a question of a little extra performance or cutting a hole in the hood.
    Lee "THE MAV" Richart
     
  15. CaptainComet

    CaptainComet Large Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2007
    Messages:
    5,004
    Likes Received:
    446
    Trophy Points:
    438
    Location:
    Clearwater, FL
    Vehicle:
    72 Comet
    I don't believe that you can put a 302 pan on a 351 block ... I am pretty sure the width is greater on the 351.

    My frame mounts are in the same place as when the 302 was installed at the factory. I am pretty sure that I got new motor mounts for the 351 and that may be a factor, but we didn't take the tranny out for the swap. It stayed on it mount the whole time. It should be in the same place front-to-back.

    All this would mean that my motor mounts might have something different going on if I have little clearance for the oil filter and others aren't. Maybe my motor is in the car a bit high.

    Lee,
    If you went straight up a bit with your oil filter, would there be contact with the lower curve of your shock tower?
     

Share This Page