Will play-doh hold shape enough for checking valve/piston clearance?

Discussion in 'Technical' started by scooper77515, Dec 17, 2007.

  1. ATOMonkey

    ATOMonkey Adam

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2005
    Messages:
    782
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    75
    Location:
    Plainfield, Indiana
    Vehicle:
    '69 & 1/2 Maverick
    Min safe gap depends on a couple of things like rod angle, max RPM, etc, but as a general rule of thumb, .050 intake - .090 exhaust.
     
  2. scooper77515

    scooper77515 No current projects.

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2004
    Messages:
    14,672
    Likes Received:
    73
    Trophy Points:
    233
    Location:
    Issaquah/Grand Coulee, WA
    Vehicle:
    Fresh out of Mavericks
    OK, this project is on hold until I get that degreeing kit from Naford...

    Always wanted to use one of those anyway...

    I am surprised that the numbers are that big. I was thinking maybe .030 all around. Glad I asked...:oops:
     
  3. Blown 5.0

    Blown 5.0 Hooked on BOOST MEMBER

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2004
    Messages:
    784
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    MS.
    Vehicle:
    1974 Maverick
    I'm not going to give a MINIUM safe clearance Because there would be some would say this would not be correct. But one key thing to take into account when figuring the minimum clearance is lifter pump up. Although i will say with 30 thousandths preload, Bennett Racing recommend to me 80 thousands on the intake and 100 thousands on the exhaust On a stock roded 5.0 with iron heads.
     
    Last edited: Dec 20, 2007
  4. scooper77515

    scooper77515 No current projects.

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2004
    Messages:
    14,672
    Likes Received:
    73
    Trophy Points:
    233
    Location:
    Issaquah/Grand Coulee, WA
    Vehicle:
    Fresh out of Mavericks
    If I am anywhere near .100, I will do more research before I start it up. Just to be sure...
     
  5. ATOMonkey

    ATOMonkey Adam

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2005
    Messages:
    782
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    75
    Location:
    Plainfield, Indiana
    Vehicle:
    '69 & 1/2 Maverick
    .030 preload with the recommended .080 and .100 gives you .050 and .070 net (lifter fully pumped up and extended), which is pretty much standard. A lot of people will tell you min of .100 net on the exhaust since the exhaust valve is opening while the piston is coming up. It's good to get as much clearance as you can there. Since the exhaust valve is also smaller than the intake valve, you get more clearance that way too.

    Since the intake is closing as the piston is coming up (both moving the same direction), you can run a slightly smaller clearance. I've seen as little as .030 on the intake, but would not recommend that for a street motor.

    If your clearance is not big enough, you can move the cam advanced or retarded a couple of degrees with an offset bushing to get the clearance you want. It'll make the engine run different, but clearance is more important.
     
  6. PaulS

    PaulS Member extrordiare

    Joined:
    May 3, 2004
    Messages:
    4,858
    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Seattle area
    Vehicle:
    1966 Mustang, 1972, 73, 73 and 73 Mavericks
     
  7. ShadowMaster

    ShadowMaster The Bad Guy

    Joined:
    May 15, 2005
    Messages:
    1,156
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    95
    Location:
    The ShadowLands
    Vehicle:
    1969 1/2 Maverick
    You know Scott.....you could have just asked for help. Typical safe clearance factor: .080" intake/.100" exhaust. I have run them a little closer but it must be checked. I'm off work all this week (we're closed for the week) so let me know.
     
  8. ford84stepside

    ford84stepside Lone Wolf

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2004
    Messages:
    4,038
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    132
    Location:
    Berry Alabama
    Vehicle:
    1947 Lincoln Zephyr Coupe
    I think Scott is playing in the water at the beach this week....
     
  9. stmanser

    stmanser Looking for a Maverick

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2005
    Messages:
    2,818
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    112
    Location:
    Davenport, Iowa
    i never went through all this when i did the last 2 engines i built.. they worked just fine.

    am i missing something
     
  10. scooper77515

    scooper77515 No current projects.

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2004
    Messages:
    14,672
    Likes Received:
    73
    Trophy Points:
    233
    Location:
    Issaquah/Grand Coulee, WA
    Vehicle:
    Fresh out of Mavericks
    Shadow... i have called you 3-4 times in the last few months, with no calls back. So, i HAVE tried to ask...

    Now that you are back, you can tell me what I did wrong.

    And, i really AM at the beach jetskiing on this very WARM Christmas holiday. Feel free to come down for some beach jet-skiing...:thumbs2:
     
  11. PaulS

    PaulS Member extrordiare

    Joined:
    May 3, 2004
    Messages:
    4,858
    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Seattle area
    Vehicle:
    1966 Mustang, 1972, 73, 73 and 73 Mavericks
    It is snowing here, Perfect weather for building transmissions and working in the garage.
     
  12. ShadowMaster

    ShadowMaster The Bad Guy

    Joined:
    May 15, 2005
    Messages:
    1,156
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    95
    Location:
    The ShadowLands
    Vehicle:
    1969 1/2 Maverick
    No way in hell am I getting on a jet ski. I may be nocturnal and cold-blooded but aquatic does not come into the picture.

    Check your PM. Haven't seen any calls.....the number is in the pm.

    Simon,
    You are just assembling engines. You are not degreeing in a camshaft nor are you pushing the limits of valve to piston clearance with your camshaft profiles. There comes a time when you might decide to tinker with cam timing to see if the engine likes the cam advanced or retarded a certain amount. In those cases you should degree the cam and then check the available valve to piston clearance to make sure you have adequate clearance.

    Got questions? Ask now because this is about the only time of the year I am in a giving mood. :D
     
  13. don graham

    don graham MCG State Rep

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2002
    Messages:
    15,800
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    302
    Location:
    arizona city, az.
    Vehicle:
    70 mav, 71 grabber, 73 Comet, 2004 f-250 crew cab diesel, 2001 f-250, 2004 explorer, 2007 Gold Wing trike.
    that's questionable SD. They say on the ffw forum that you always give everyone a hard time all year long.:D
     
  14. ShadowMaster

    ShadowMaster The Bad Guy

    Joined:
    May 15, 2005
    Messages:
    1,156
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    95
    Location:
    The ShadowLands
    Vehicle:
    1969 1/2 Maverick
    :lolup:

    Bah Humbug. :D
     
  15. mavman

    mavman Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2002
    Messages:
    2,028
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    112
    Location:
    Arkansas
    Vehicle:
    '75 Maverick, '03 super duty, '04 Mustang Vee-six!
    I use modeling clay. Then put a little bit of flour on the top of the clay to keep it from sticking to the valves when you rotate the engine.

    The intake chases the piston down the hole when it's at it's closest clearance.
    the piston chases the exhaust valve closed when at it's closest clearance.

    You should always check piston-to-valve clearance on ANY OHV/OHC engine that you're building, even a stock one. You never know when something is a little out of whack, and I guarantee you that it's much easier to fix it now than it is to have to take it all apart and fix what is damaged later. I recall someone who assembled a 440 Chrysler and forgot to check it..and bent every valve, damaged every piston, bent all 16 pushrods.....all because he didn't take 15 minutes to check the clearance. That was one of many expensive mistakes. In fact I've made those mistakes myself but at least I checked it before hand and knew that it was "tight".
     

Share This Page